跳到內容

本頁面的來源

本頁面的每項論述都對應固定的修訂版本。開啟路徑即可檢視驗證所依據的確切來源。

atomicals-electrumx-1.5.2.0

Atomicals ElectrumX

修訂 v1.5.2.0 (2025-03-27)

開啟固定路徑: splitAndInflation

Version-sensitive ARC-20 and Atomicals validation behavior used as the pinned reference baseline.

UTXO Safety Planner

Raw

Classify asset-bearing UTXOs, see the risks, and generate deterministic candidate plans before you construct a transaction.

Protocol behavior Verified 2026-09-02 Metadata & Sources

Describes the Atomicals protocol itself at the pinned reference revision. It does not promise that any product exposes it.

Page ID
tools/utxo-safety
Normative authority
Executed source code at a pinned revision
Networks
mainnet, testnet, signet, regtest
Documentation version
2026.08
Audience
holder, developer, everyone
Owner
bitcoin-universe-docs
Sources
Known limitations
  • Classification is only as good as the assignment data you import. Without indexer data the planner says unknown and never claims safety.
  • Plans are unsigned intents. The planner never signs, never broadcasts, and never performs an address lookup without an explicit action at a chosen endpoint.

本頁內容尚未翻譯。

Treat everything you paste here as sensitive local data. It stays in this page's memory, is never stored, never sent anywhere, and disappears when you close the tab.

1. Import UTXOs

2. Choose an objective

Every candidate plan is examined for the classic loss patterns: accidental asset burns, mixed token inputs, unknown assignment state, insufficient asset change, unsafe output ordering, dust, fees that cannot cover the virtual size, unconfirmed input chains, and reused change addresses. Each warning links to the rule page and the pinned source revision behind it.

Unknown stays unknown: an output with no assignment data is classified as unknown with no confidence, and the planner refuses to call it safe.

Plans are compared on asset safety, fee, input count, and privacy impact side by side. There is no single score, because collapsing those axes into a number hides exactly the trade-offs you need to see.

Export the plan as JSON, as a Protocol Lab scenario to replay its effects, or as a CLI command sequence to run against your own setup. When fields for a structurally valid unsigned PSBT are missing, the planner exports an explicit transaction intent and names what is missing instead of fabricating values.